Optimizing Print Profiles for Canson Extra Photo Quality Paper: A Comprehensive Guide

Understanding the Paper Collection

The user has acquired an extensive collection of A3+ paper, including brands like Canson, Ilford, Epson, Canon, and HP. The variety encompasses different textures and finishes such as Canvas, Fine Art, Glossy, Semigloss, Photo Quality, and Matte. This diverse collection presents an opportunity for creativity but demands precise profiling for accurate color reproduction.

Profiling Tools and Challenges

The user employs ArgyllCMS software for creating profiles and an Epson XP 15000 printer. However, lacking X-rite software, the user faces challenges in creating custom profiles for certain papers. To overcome this, they seek suggestions on profiling techniques and tools, emphasizing the use of BN spacers for the i1pro device.

Print Trials and Challenges

The user conducted print trials on Canson Extra Photo Quality paper, focusing on small 100x150mm (A6) charts with 180 patches. Using Epson Photo Quality and Epson Matte media types, the prints revealed differences in black and white details and contrast. Notably, the Matte image exhibited better results. The user is considering trying Epson Glossy and Semigloss media types for further experimentation.

ICC Profile Comparison

To compare ICC profiles, the user utilized iccview.de and observed that the Photo Quality profile has a slightly wider gamut, while the Matte profile excels in black reproduction. Seeking advice on which profile to choose, the user contemplates combining the strengths of both or conducting additional trials with Glossy and Semigloss media types.

Feedback and Troubleshooting

Engaging with the community, the user sought feedback on their ICC profiles. A fellow user, mavtop, recommended using i1Profiler software for free, specifying compatibility with older i1 spectros. However, a concern arose regarding the assumed white point in the profiles at L=67, prompting further investigation.

Addressing White Point Issues

A community member points out a significant concern – the profiles assume a white point at L=67, which is a medium gray and not suitable for a true white. While the cause remains uncertain, the suggestion to check the data file/sheet with color patches and update ArgyllCMS to the latest version is given.

Moving Forward with Optimized Profiling

In response to the feedback, the user plans to reprint the target with updated ArgyllCMS software, possibly reverting to an older version. The iterative process of trial, feedback, and adjustment is crucial in achieving accurate print profiles, especially when dealing with diverse paper types.

Conclusion and Community Engagement

As the user continues their quest for optimal print profiles, the engagement with the community proves invaluable. Troubleshooting, sharing experiences, and seeking advice contribute to a collaborative approach in overcoming challenges. Follow along for more updates on our YouTube Channel [link], explore our Tech Blog, or visit us locally in Greensboro, North Carolina. Your insights and experiences are always welcome in our vibrant community of tech enthusiasts.